I would have never anticipated that C+ factory would maintain such longevity in the market, given the considerable number of buyers patronizing them. It appears that when purchasing from Clean factory entails extended waiting periods, some individuals opt to acquire their Rolex watches from C+ factory, which consistently maintains ample stock and minimizes waiting times. Notably, their quality closely rivals that of Rolex replicas produced by Clean. The primary discernible disparity lies in the movement employed; for instance, in the case of the Rolex Pepsi GMT, Clean utilizes the Dandong 3285 movement, while C+ employs the Shanghai 3285. Previously, I held reservations about the Shanghai 3285 movement, but it has proven to be reliable, with numerous factories utilizing it and demonstrating stability, albeit with a slightly shorter power reserve compared to the .
The C+ Pepsi Rolex GMT serves as a compelling alternative to the Clean Rolex Pepsi GMT. Clean unveiled the V3 edition last year, and now C+ has also adopted the same ceramic bezel for their V3 edition. Moreover, C+ offers the watch at a more accessible price point. However, I have a grievance against Clean factory: they have introduced several iterations of this 1:1 super replica watch to the market, including V1, V2, V2s, and V3, each accompanied by a price hike upon release. This practice has led to a proliferation of different versions in the market, leaving customers perplexed as to which edition is superior. While some assert that V3 reigns supreme, Clean recently introduced the V2+ edition, touted as an enhancement over V2, with claims of the closest bezel color resemblance to the genuine watch, supported by numerous reviewers. Amidst this array of options, confusion inevitably ensues. If one decides to purchase the V2+ edition, will the dealer dispatch the correct version? Such considerations underscore the complexities inherent in acquiring replica watches.